Environmental permits

Environmental permits for industrial projects in Romania: approval process and common pitfalls

Most of the industrial projects planned in Romania-relating either to manufacturing, energy, waste management, construction, or logistics-must undergo a very detailed environmental permitting process before they are allowed to enter service. This process can be complex, highly technical, and often takes a long period of time. Lack of proper understanding of the steps to be taken or failure in following the proper procedure leads, in most instances, to delays, increased costs, or-even worse-litigation and sanctions. Environmental permitting in Romania is one of the most important factors for investors and companies interested in opening new facilities or expanding their current activity.

Under Romanian law, environmental protection is put at the forefront of industrial planning. Environmental permits and approvals ensure that new projects account for pollution prevention, resource use, waste management, and potential impact on human health. The key authority overseeing this framework is the National Environmental Protection Agency (ANPM), along with its local county-level agencies.

Stages of environmental permitting process in Romania

Generally, obtaining environmental permits in Romania is not a single-step exercise but usually involves starting with an initial assessment where the competent authority decides if the project requires a simple environmental approval or is subject to an impact assessment procedure. This early phase is crucial because it sets the roadmap for the rest of the permitting timeline.

Most industrial projects must go through a screening stage to establish whether an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is mandatory. For high-impact projects, such as power plants, waste facilities, or large manufacturing sites, the authorities will usually require a full EIA. The latter includes, among others, the preparation of in-depth studies, consultations with local communities, and the presentation of technical documentation on expected emissions, water use, waste output, and mitigation measures. Only then, after the EIA has been reviewed and accepted, does the authority issue an environmental agreement, which is required prior to the start of construction.

After construction, companies have to obtain an environmental permit that demonstrates the operation of a facility according to previously established conditions. This permit covers operational activities, levels of pollution, procedures for waste handling, and monitoring activities. It is valid only for a limited period and needs renewal after some time. Any key change in industrial operations, like enhanced capacity of production or modification of technologies, often involves updating or reassessment of the permit.

Interaction with Romanian environmental authorities

The successful permitting process requires close communication with the ANPM and respective local environmental agencies, including very detailed technical documentation for submission, response to requests for clarification, and active participation in public consultation procedures. In particular, such early consultation with the authorities can greatly reduce the risk of delays in projects with sensitive environmental aspects.

Public participation plays an important role in Romanian environmental law. Communities may file objections, request hearings, or challenge the adequacy of impact studies. This layer of scrutiny means that companies must ensure their documentation is both technically sound and clearly explained. Thorough environmental studies and transparent communication often help avoid disputes and objections that could extend the approval timeline.

Authorities also work alongside other regulators during the permitting process. Depending on the nature of the project, additional approvals may be needed from water authorities, forestry agencies, health authorities, or construction regulators. Coordinating these requirements can be time-consuming, which is why companies often rely on multidisciplinary teams to prepare environmental documentation.

Common pitfalls in the environmental permitting process

A recurring difficulty for industrial investors is underestimating the complexity of the permitting framework. Delays frequently arise when companies submit incomplete documentation, overlook technical requirements, or modify their project design mid-procedure. Even small changes in project parameters can require updated impact assessments, restarting parts of the process.

Another frequent issue is insufficient public consultation. When communities feel excluded or inadequately informed, they are more likely to contest the project, file administrative complaints, or initiate legal proceedings. This not only slows down the approval process but may also jeopardise the issuance of the environmental agreement.

Companies also encounter problems when they begin construction before receiving all necessary approvals. For projects where the environmental agreement is mandatory, the authorities strictly apply the principle that no construction works may begin before the environmental agreement is obtained.

Finally, neglecting post-approval obligations is a major source of litigation. Once an environmental permit is issued, companies must monitor emissions, maintain records, and report regularly to the authorities. Non-compliance with these operational conditions can lead to permit suspension or revocation, significantly affecting business continuity.

Litigation risks and enforcement in Romania

Litigation involving environmental permits has increased in recent years as NGOs, community groups, and regulators have taken a more active role in monitoring industrial developments. Challenges can target the legality of permits, the adequacy of environmental studies, or the failure of authorities to properly assess environmental risks.

Courts often examine whether the permitting authority respected procedural steps, including screening, consultation, and impact evaluation. Companies may face litigation not only during the permitting phase but also after operations begin, particularly if pollution incidents occur or if monitoring reports reveal irregularities.

Administrative sanctions are also common. Environmental authorities can impose fines, require corrective measures, suspend operations, or revoke permits for serious violations. In cases involving significant environmental damage, criminal liability may arise for both companies and responsible managers.

Strengthening compliance for industrial projects

To reduce risk, companies investing in Romania should adopt a structured compliance approach from the earliest planning stage. This includes engaging environmental experts before submitting applications, conducting preliminary studies to identify potential environmental sensitivities, and preparing thorough documentation for the authorities. Maintaining clear communication with regulators and stakeholders also helps minimise objections and delays.

A robust internal compliance system is essential once operations begin. Monitoring environmental performance, recording data accurately, and responding promptly to any deviation from permitted limits demonstrate diligence and help avoid enforcement actions.

Strengthening environmental compliance in Romanian industrial projects

Environmental permitting in Romania is a demanding but manageable process when companies approach it with the right preparation. Understanding the permitting stages, maintaining clear communication with authorities, and anticipating common pitfalls are essential steps for securing timely approvals. With careful planning and ongoing compliance, industrial investors can reduce legal risk, avoid costly delays, and ensure their projects operate confidently within Romania’s environmental framework.