Share Buybacks

Share buybacks and capital reductions in Romania: legal framework, tax implications and strategic corporate use

Legal overview of share buybacks and capital reduction in Romania

Share buybacks and capital reduction in Romania are increasingly used as strategic corporate instruments under Romanian Companies Law no. 31/1990. For joint stock companies and limited liability companies, these mechanisms allow shareholders to restructure equity participation, distribute excess capital and optimise financial ratios while remaining compliant with strict statutory safeguards.

In practice, capital restructuring in Romania is no longer limited to distressed scenarios. It is frequently deployed in private equity transactions, founder liquidity planning, joint ventures and corporate reorganisations. However, Romanian company law imposes clear procedural requirements, creditor protection mechanisms and solvency tests that must be observed to avoid director liability and shareholder litigation.

Understanding the legal framework governing share buybacks in Romania and capital reduction procedures is essential before implementing any restructuring strategy.

Capital reduction under Romanian Companies Law no. 31/1990

Romanian Companies Law no. 31/1990 regulates capital reduction for both joint stock companies and limited liability companies. The law allows share capital to be reduced through several legally recognised mechanisms, each producing distinct legal and financial effects.

Capital reduction may be achieved by decreasing the nominal value of shares, cancelling shares, distributing assets to shareholders or covering accounting losses. The chosen structure must reflect the company’s financial position and long term corporate objectives.

The resolution approving the capital reduction must be adopted by the general meeting of shareholders in compliance with quorum and majority requirements. The decision must then be published, triggering a statutory creditor opposition period. During this period, creditors may challenge the transaction if they demonstrate that their claims are jeopardised.

Failure to comply with publication and opposition rules may result in suspension or annulment of the transaction and may expose directors to personal liability.

Share buybacks in Romanian joint stock companies

Share buybacks in Romania are primarily available to joint stock companies and are subject to strict statutory conditions. The acquisition of own shares must be authorised by the general meeting of shareholders and is generally limited to a maximum of ten percent of the share capital, unless specific legal exceptions apply.

The buyback must be financed exclusively from distributable reserves. Romanian law prohibits using subscribed share capital to fund the acquisition, as such practice would undermine creditor protection principles. After the transaction, the company’s net assets cannot be below a certain minimum level as required by law.

The aim of these restrictions is to avoid manipulation of the capital and ensure the safety of both creditors and minority shareholders. Romanian courts are increasingly requiring not only compliance with procedural requirements, but also the economic reality of the transaction.

Creditor protection and solvency tests in capital reduction

Creditors’ protection is one of the most important aspects of capital reduction in Romania. Share capital reduction or distribution of the company’s assets may have a negative effect on the financial situation of the company and its ability to pay its debts.

Under Romanian law, the decision on capital reduction must be published, and creditors have a statutory right to file opposition within the prescribed period. If the creditor succeeds in proving that its claim is at risk, the court may oblige the company to provide sufficient guarantees or stay the implementation of the reduction.

In addition to mere compliance, the board of directors must perform a thorough solvency analysis prior to approving a share buyback or capital reduction. This analysis should cover liquidity forecasts, debt agreements, contingent liabilities, and overall financial viability.

Insufficient solvency analysis is one of the most common causes of disputes arising post-transaction, especially when minority shareholders or creditors claim that the transaction was structured with the main purpose of extracting value.

Tax treatment of share buybacks and capital reduction in Romania

The tax implications of capital reduction and share buybacks in Romania depend on the legal and economic structure of the transaction. Distributions to shareholders may be classified as dividends, capital gains or return of capital contributions, each with distinct tax consequences.

For Romanian resident shareholders, dividend income is subject to domestic dividend taxation rules, while capital gains may fall under separate regimes. For non resident shareholders, the application of double tax treaties and European Union directives can materially affect withholding tax obligations.

Romanian tax authorities increasingly apply substance over form analysis when reviewing corporate transactions. Artificial structuring intended to recharacterise dividends as return of capital may be challenged, resulting in tax reassessments, penalties and interest.

From an accounting perspective, companies reporting under IFRS or Romanian GAAP must ensure accurate recognition of capital reductions and buybacks. Distributions must be made exclusively from legally available reserves, and financial statements must accurately reflect the impact of the transaction on equity and net assets.

Strategic corporate uses of capital reduction in Romania

In modern corporate practice, capital reduction in Romania is frequently integrated into broader restructuring strategies. For founders, it may provide partial liquidity without relinquishing control. For private equity investors, it can operate as a structured exit mechanism or as part of phased divestment planning.

In mergers and acquisitions, capital reduction may be implemented prior to completion to optimise the balance sheet, eliminate legacy shareholdings or facilitate valuation adjustments. Post acquisition, share buybacks may assist in capital structure optimisation and shareholder realignment.

In joint venture environments, capital reduction mechanisms can address dilution issues, rebalance equity participation or resolve structural deadlocks. When carefully coordinated with shareholder agreements, these instruments operate alongside drag along and tag along provisions within a coherent exit architecture.

However, the more complex the corporate structuring objective, the greater the need for rigorous legal design and compliance discipline.

Director liability and shareholder litigation risk

Directors approving a share buyback or capital reduction in Romania must comply with fiduciary duties and act in the company’s best interest. They must ensure continued solvency, strict adherence to statutory reserve requirements and equal treatment of shareholders.

Transactions perceived as abusive or disproportionately favouring majority shareholders may trigger minority litigation. Creditors may also pursue opposition proceedings or liability claims if unlawful distributions impair their recovery prospects.

Romanian courts increasingly examine the proportionality and economic justification of capital restructuring decisions. Formal adherence to procedure is insufficient if the transaction lacks a sound business rationale or undermines corporate stability.

Comprehensive documentation of board deliberations, financial analyses and risk assessments is therefore essential to mitigate exposure.

Legal advice on share buybacks and capital reduction in Romania

Share buybacks and capital reductions in Romania are effective instruments for corporate restructuring, shareholder liquidity and capital optimisation. Nevertheless, they operate within a tightly regulated legal framework under Romanian Companies Law no. 31/1990 and are subject to creditor protection rules, solvency tests and tax scrutiny.

Improperly structured capital reduction or share repurchase transactions may result in director liability, minority shareholder disputes and tax reassessments. Conversely, when carefully designed and implemented, they provide a robust and legally compliant method of restructuring corporate equity in Romania.

Companies, founders and investors considering capital reduction or share buybacks in Romania should obtain specialised legal advice to ensure full regulatory compliance, tax efficiency and long term governance stability.